Diversity in scientific publishing is a strategic contribution to plural science

Who has a voice in science? Who decides what is published and which knowledge is legitimized?

The November editorial of CSP proposes the above reflections and discusses the inequalities that permeate scientific publication, such as those of gender, race, class, territory, and language.

The authors of the editorial emphasize that recognizing these asymmetries is the first step towards transforming them and building more plural, inclusive editorial practices committed to the diversity of knowledge and experiences.

Read the full editorial on the CSP website.